floodfox.com floodfox.com
Home About Us Privacy Policy Terms of Service Add Your Link Add Your Article
Search:   
Add Url
 
 

Children & Teens

 

Companies & Business

 

Games & Play

 

Fitness & Health

 

Automobiles

 

Internet & Computers

 

Research & Science

 

Academics & Learning

 

Sports

 

Events & News

 

Finance & Banking

 

Garden & Home

 

Self Management

 

Healthcare & Treatment

 

Entertainment

 

Art & Culture

 

Tour & Travel

 

Online Shopping

 

People & Communities

 

Property & Estate

 

Policies & Law

 

Relationship & Lifestyle

 

Jobs & Careers

 

Drink & Food

 

Home –› Jobs & Careers –› Employment Ethics
 

Corporate Crime

 
Author: Steve Gillman
Corporate crime? I'm not sure that there is such a thing. If we want to reduce the crimes that are given that lable, we need to quit handing out large punitive fines to corporations. The idea isn't as radical as it sounds.

First of all, when I say that there isn't such a thing as corporate crime, I simply mean that it is always individual people who commit crimes. With that in mind, you can imagine what my better way to reduce this crime is: Go after the criminals!

Who Pays For Corporate Crime?

Exactly who pays when a large corporation is fined for breaking the law? To begin with, the stockholders pay. Many of these are innocent retirees who have money invested with the company and had no idea they were breaking the law. Then the employees pay with the loss of jobs, if the financial situation of the company is damaged by the fines. Who doesn't pay? Just the criminals - the individuals who chose to break the law.

All crimes are committed by PEOPLE, not companies. When a company dumps poisons into the environment, a PERSON made the decision to do that (or several people). When a company steals from a pension fund or violates workers rights, INDIVIDUALS made those decisions. People commit corporate crime, not corporations!

If you want to stop corporate crime, start putting the individuals who are involved in the crime in PRISON. Our current system often has company officers making cost/benefit calculations as to whether the profits from certain crimes are greater than what the occasional fines add up to. Even though laws are broken, they stand little chance of being held personally responsible. Why not hold them responsible?

To fine companies for the actual costs imposed on others by a crime is appropriate. We have to clean up toxic messes, and in other cases compensate those who suffer damages. This also means that shareholders have a reason to be careful in who they elect to the board of directors. However, "punitive" fines are ridiculous unless they are levied against the individual criminals. Make the person who committed the crime pay the fine.

Is this such a radical idea? I don't think so! By the way, which do you think is more likely to deter a corporate officer from committing a crime, a fine that is paid by the company, and doesn't even affect his salary, or ten years in jail? The answer to that gives us the answer to corporate crime.

Author Bio:

Steve Gillman has studied unusual ways to make money for thirty years. To learn more, visit his website, Unusual Ways To Make Money: www.UnusualWaysToMakeMoney.com

You can search for this article using: business ethics, code of ethics, computer ethics, define ethics, personal code of ethics
 
 
 

Related Articles

 
Job Hunting Tips: Staying Active
 
5 Tips for Valuing Yourself to Get What You Want and Deserve
 
Resume Writing Services
 
Working to Live or Living to Work?
 
How To Generate Unique Business Ideas That Make Money?
 
Job Search Got You Twisting in the Wind?
 
Protect Your Business by Performing a Background Check
 
Work from Home
 
Career Success - How to Deal With Office Rumours and Gossip
 
Office Chairs, Choose Your Options Wisely
 
 
 
   Home >> Privacy Policy >> Terms of Service
© 2008 www.floodfox.com All Rights Reserved.